The Hidden Pitfalls of Activity-Based Teaching

6 Ways to Get It Wrong

Students love activities in the classroom. This is true in the primary level and also in the higher education level.

But let’s be honest: when students hear “activities,” they don’t think of deep learning. They think of games, Kahoot quizzes, classroom scavenger hunts, or a chance to move around.

And many teachers also equate activities with engagement, motivation, and holistic learning. It’s well-intentioned but misleading. Because without careful design, activity-based teaching can be unproductive, ineffective, and even meaningless.

6 Ways to Fail at Activity-based Teaching

Here’s how activity-based teaching fails and what to do instead.

1. More Activities ≠ More Learning
   Cramming your lesson with activities does not necessarily lead to a more meaningful learning. Teachers can assume that students must be learning because they see students are doing something.
   
   Ask yourself:
   Are these activities necessary, relevant, and adding value to students' understanding? If they don’t enhance conceptual clarity, they’re just busywork.
   

2. Mistaking Engagement for Thinking
   Activity doesn’t necessarily mean cognition. Students can be active without being mentally engaged. A lesson filled with movement, discussions, and hands-on tasks might create a classroom buzz, but is it intellectually stimulating?
   
   Ask yourself:
   Are students simply doing the activity, or are they making connections to concepts and theories? If they’re just going through the motions, the activity is a distraction, not a learning tool.
   

3. Fun for Fun’s Sake is Just Fluff
   Teachers think that as long as students are entertained, they will be more motivated to learn. But that’s not true. A lesson packed with icebreakers, energizers, and trending online games might be fun—but fun isn’t the goal. Learning is.
   
   Ask yourself:
   Are these activities aligned with the learning objectives and intended outcomes? If the answer is no, they’re just fluff.
   

4. The Seductive Details Trap
   Teachers think that more stimulation = more engagement. But unnecessary words, slides, images, jokes, stories, and activities (aka seductive details) don’t just waste time, they actively hurt learning by overloading students’ cognitive capacity. They might be interesting but are irrelevant to the learning goals. In reality, cluttered lessons lead to divided attention and lower retention.
   
   Ask yourself:
   Will these activities help students focus on learning, or will they become distractions? Cut the excess. Keep it clear.
   

5. The Illusion of “Tech-Enhanced” Learning
   Online quizzes, simulations, and digital games seem cutting-edge—but tech doesn’t automatically make teaching better and learning meaningful. The trap is that teachers can default to technology just because it’s available, assuming that more tools means better learning.
   
   Ask yourself:
   Am I using this because it’s effective, or because it’s trending? If the answer is hype over substance, ditch it.
   

6. Simple is often Powerful
   Teachers believe that “innovative” means complex. Activity-based teaching doesn’t have to be flashy. Think-Pair-Share can be more powerful than an elaborate tech-driven simulation. We don’t have to surrender our teaching to technology every single time.
   
   Ask yourself:
   Am I designing this to impress, or to make students think hard? Sometimes the simplest methods are the most effective.
   
   (These ideas are hugely inspired by this post on Linkedin by Scott Winstead.)

---

Activities Need to Serve Learning, Not The Other Way Around

Just to make it clear: activity-based teaching isn’t the problem. Mindless activity-based teaching is.

The goal of teaching is not just to “do activities.” It’s to design activities that make students think, connect, and understand.

If we ditch the fluff, cut the distractions, and refocus on meaningful learning, we can transform activity-based teaching from a gimmick into a powerful instructional tool.